Corporate · Investment · Employment
Vesting
In practice
Vesting protects the team against someone leaving early and still keeping a large stake. Without vesting, that person remains a shareholder without contributing any further. Investors in funding rounds strongly dislike this ‘dead equity’. That is why there is often a ‘cliff’ for the first year. Anyone who leaves during this time loses all the shares or options covered by the vesting. After one year, the entire portion for that year vests at once. After that, further shares usually vest monthly. Reverse vesting is chosen for tax reasons and to avoid red tape. The shares are transferred in full from the outset, with a duty to transfer the unvested shares back on leaving.
The terms on which vested and unvested shares are transferred back often depend on whether the person is a ‘good leaver’ or a ‘bad leaver’. The question is whether the departure was triggered by misconduct, happened for no particular reason or was necessary, for example, on health grounds. Under German law, such clauses can be permissible in start-ups. The compensation for the departing shareholder is reviewed separately. For tax purposes, shares transferred in connection with work for the company can count as wages.
Sources
- BGH (Federal Court of Justice), judgments of 19 September 2005, II ZR 342/03 and II ZR 173/04: duty to transfer shares back on leaving is permissible if there is an objective reason (in German)
- KG Berlin (Higher Regional Court of Berlin), order of 12 August 2024, 2 U 94/21: vesting clause with a duty to transfer shares back is permissible in a start-up (in German)
Licence: CC BY 4.0*
How to cite: Vesting, in: Berlin Online Glossary of German Business Law, published by STRUB.LAW, as at 9 September 2026, https://strub.law/en/glossary/vesting/, CC BY 4.0
*This licence applies only to the written entries of the Berlin Online Glossary.